that not only did someone(s) have the idea of monitoring the press, but that others found no reason to negate this idea from the very start to begin with. What papers write about or not write about, or how news organizations spin the news is not the governments business. That would indeed violate the First Amendment of free speech and freedom of the press. So the real question is, how and why does a governmental agency propose to willfully violate the very first rule on the books by suggesting an unconstitutional action? And why are we not watching some kind of court hearing or major public discussion about this? Why is it that so few seem to care? Here are some details worth reading...
RSS Feed
